There's a big difference between Resnais working with Criterion, watching the film with them, and asking them to tweak the contrast, and Tarr "working" with Facets. The problems with the
Sátántangó DVD aren't so much to do with the look of the film itself, but rather with Facets' inability to produce a DVD competently. As Gary himself puts it:
Gary Tooze wrote:The term 'director approved' seems to get thrown around a lot these past few years. What is can mean is the director endorses the print that the digital transfer is made from. It, very infrequently, means he/she approves the final encode - where anything can happen - from cropping to incorrect standard conversion. The fact that this Facet's package is labeled as 'director approved' is fairly meaningless.
Granted, we are all aware that directors can make poor decisions at this stage (Friedkin anyone?) but it's still an objective fact that people can consider when weighing which transfer they prefer.