952 The Magnificent Ambersons

Discuss releases by Criterion and the films on them. Threads may contain spoilers!
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: The Magnificent Ambersons (Welles, 1942)

#276 Post by domino harvey » Tue Jan 22, 2019 2:02 pm

If we're talking films critical of the direction America is going, pencil in any of the countless social problem pictures of the 30s to start with, then as Drucker mentions move on to the Noirs of the forties. There's no shortage of Depression-era movies that showed a dark side of the country. I think the question as posed is pretty odd, though

User avatar
movielocke
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:44 am

Re: The Magnificent Ambersons (Welles, 1942)

#277 Post by movielocke » Tue Jan 22, 2019 5:26 pm

Going through the 5.5 hours of non commentary extras lately, it is a must to go through the two key interviews back to back because Simon Callow gives one, fairly traditional take on Welles partying in Brazil, and Joseph McBride gives an alternate (meticulously documented and naming of names of the villains), heavily researched (he found the receipts, so to speak) take on Welles and Brazil.

The Herrmann extra was fine, but I found it somewhat uninteresting compared to the other two interviews. The Dick Cavett show might be the best Dick Cavett bit I've ever seen on TCM or as an extra on a disc, Welles is in fine form, and it's a completely fabulous and fun and insightful interview.
Last edited by movielocke on Tue Jan 22, 2019 5:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
FrauBlucher
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:28 pm
Location: Greenwich Village

Re: The Magnificent Ambersons (Welles, 1942)

#278 Post by FrauBlucher » Tue Jan 22, 2019 5:27 pm

Drucker wrote:Any other film that calls out American "progress" as perhaps a negative?
Awesome thought. I can’t think of anything. It would be like someone making a film today that wishes for life before the internet/social media.

I did think of the opposite though. The Fountainhead (1949), Gary Cooper plays an architect that wants to build modern structures against the wishes of people that hired him to build buildings that mirror the older more staid reality of the time.

Calvin
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 11:12 am

Re: The Magnificent Ambersons (Welles, 1942)

#279 Post by Calvin » Tue Jan 22, 2019 7:48 pm

It's perhaps stating the obvious, but the theme can be found outside of American cinema in Kozaburo Yoshimura's The Ball at the Anjo House and Satyajit Ray's The Music Room.

User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 pm

Re: The Magnificent Ambersons (Welles, 1942)

#280 Post by knives » Tue Jan 22, 2019 8:22 pm

FrauBlucher wrote:
Tue Jan 22, 2019 5:27 pm
Drucker wrote:Any other film that calls out American "progress" as perhaps a negative?
Awesome thought. I can’t think of anything. It would be like someone making a film today that wishes for life before the internet/social media.
Isn't that the plot to about 90% of westerns?

User avatar
FrauBlucher
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:28 pm
Location: Greenwich Village

Re: The Magnificent Ambersons (Welles, 1942)

#281 Post by FrauBlucher » Tue Jan 22, 2019 9:36 pm

True. But wasn 't Ambersons made closer to it's time of reference, as opposed to westerns being further in the past.

User avatar
Drucker
Your Future our Drucker
Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 9:37 am

Re: The Magnificent Ambersons (Welles, 1942)

#282 Post by Drucker » Tue Jan 22, 2019 11:08 pm

In several of the extras, the strength of Welles' critique of American progress came off as central to the original vision of the film. I found that critique more direct and striking than anything I could think of, though of course that broader critique runs through many other films. I wanted to ask if anything else was comparable. The only thing I can really think of is like I said, Heaven's Gate, or perhaps the "this is going to be a fine country, some day" line in The Searchers.

JakeStewart
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2019 10:44 pm

Re: The Magnificent Ambersons (Welles, 1942)

#283 Post by JakeStewart » Tue Jan 22, 2019 11:49 pm

But isn't also critical of the way America was before it progressed in the 20th century? George essentially sabotages his mother's life and happiness because he can't let go of some silly social principle.

User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 pm

Re: The Magnificent Ambersons (Welles, 1942)

#284 Post by knives » Wed Jan 23, 2019 6:00 pm

FrauBlucher wrote:
Tue Jan 22, 2019 9:36 pm
True. But wasn 't Ambersons made closer to it's time of reference, as opposed to westerns being further in the past.
Not originally.

User avatar
FrauBlucher
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:28 pm
Location: Greenwich Village

Re: The Magnificent Ambersons (Welles, 1942)

#285 Post by FrauBlucher » Wed Jan 23, 2019 6:22 pm

I don’t get the feeling that Ford was longing for or wanting life to be as in Stagecoach as Welles was for The Ambersons.

User avatar
Big Ben
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 12:54 pm
Location: Great Falls, Montana

Re: The Magnificent Ambersons (Welles, 1942)

#286 Post by Big Ben » Wed Jan 23, 2019 6:29 pm

The thing about "The West" is that that time period only really encompass a very short time period. The most fertile period was about thirty years, from 1865 to 1895 although it extended to a much less degree into the twentieth century. The Wild Bunch for instance is at the very end of this taking place in 1913. Booth Tarkington's original novel was published in 1918. knives is absolutely correct in his statement.

User avatar
FrauBlucher
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:28 pm
Location: Greenwich Village

Re: The Magnificent Ambersons (Welles, 1942)

#287 Post by FrauBlucher » Wed Jan 23, 2019 6:44 pm

I still think there is a difference about Welles’ contemporary longing and something that was based on the legend of the west.

User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 pm

Re: The Magnificent Ambersons (Welles, 1942)

#288 Post by knives » Wed Jan 23, 2019 8:16 pm

It wasn't a legend in the 20s and 30s. It was recent history. Just look at Hell's Hinges for example. I am not even sure that one is a period piece.

User avatar
Big Ben
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 12:54 pm
Location: Great Falls, Montana

Re: The Magnificent Ambersons (Welles, 1942)

#289 Post by Big Ben » Wed Jan 23, 2019 8:38 pm

I can only speak for myself here but I think there's a difference between longing for something long gone and the myth of the Old West. The West that most people have is one manufactured by the movies as the Wild West for the most part was pretty mundane. Conflict most certainly occurred but it was nowhere near as frequent as the movies made it look. For instance the average town had about a murder per year. Boasting about your kill count back then was a bit like bragging about how many people you've slept with while you were still in College. Even the most "badass" cowpunks like Billy the Kid only managed to kill four people in their entire lives.

Another thing that movies have overlooked was how important women were to those towns. The most powerful person in West could quite often be brothel madams. They not only knew secrets but quite often instrumental in getting education and healthcare infrastructure implemented into towns. The west was significantly less violent than most people think it was. But it was WAY sexier.

Welles' longing strikes me more as nostalgia driven rather than about a notion about constructed myth. It FELT easier and because of that "it was." It certainly doesn't mean Welles can't have his head in the clouds but that doesn't mean his fears about growth are unwarranted. The decay of somethings that come alongside progress and growth is not something I feel is something that's myth driven (Although you could most certainly argue about whether something that has been lost is good or bad.) and I think it's a far cry from the rootin' tootin' image of the West that was being created in cinemas at the time Welles was making Ambersons.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: The Magnificent Ambersons (Welles, 1942)

#290 Post by domino harvey » Wed Jan 23, 2019 8:48 pm

Mankiewicz's the Late George Apley would fit the bill as an anti-nostalgia progress pic too, though it still seems to me like we're all talking about something slightly different from each other!

User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 pm

Re: The Magnificent Ambersons (Welles, 1942)

#291 Post by knives » Wed Jan 23, 2019 9:29 pm

I have been assuming this was about anti-progress movies that happen to also not be nostalgic rather than, as you seem to be saying films about progress that don't treat the past with nostalgia.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: The Magnificent Ambersons (Welles, 1942)

#292 Post by domino harvey » Wed Jan 23, 2019 9:37 pm

But a film that says the past was better than the present/future is inherently nostalgic by definition (and also, I might add, completely at odds with film noir as a genre, as having no future and/or being haunted by the past is not what's being described, so not sure why that's used as an example in the initial post). This is why I remain confused here, I guess

EDIT: And Heaven's Gate does a good job of making life in the old west look miserable, so I'm not sure how that is an example of a film saying progress is bad since it goes out of its way to highlight how it would have sucked to live back then?

User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 pm

Re: The Magnificent Ambersons (Welles, 1942)

#293 Post by knives » Wed Jan 23, 2019 9:57 pm

I don't think anyone was talking about films which argue that the past is better, but rather that progress doesn't mean that the future is improved over the past. That's especially what I took the film noir comment to mean as the future is a dead end, but the past is also rancid. Heaven's Gate then also becomes a sensible example as that is a film about how the coming industrial revolution did nothing to stem flaws in American society and may even have come to exacerbate some.

User avatar
Big Ben
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 12:54 pm
Location: Great Falls, Montana

Re: The Magnificent Ambersons (Welles, 1942)

#294 Post by Big Ben » Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:10 pm

Progress isn't necessarily the issue per se but the idea that it can't come with unwanted harm isn't a disingenuous statement in my opinion. For instance one might also view technological progress as a double edged sword. In may indeed help people in all manner of ways but it's also enabled terrible harassment, doxxing, death threats, etc. With the encroachment of civilization comes all manner of benefits but it also brings sorrow and other social ills such as destruction of resources. I wonder how Welles would have looked at what the film industry nowadays due to it's more exposed nature but also the ever increasing demand studios have to make all of the money. A lamentation over the loss of something in this regard isn't inherently anti-progress in my mind but a reflection. In Monte Walsh (The original) a character remarks that the building of fences on Western land is bringing the end to an era. It's not really an angry statement but a reminder that the good times come to an end and that things are always going to be lost. "Nobody gets to be a cowboy forever." was the line that stuck with me as it was reflective (If a bit simple.) but it wasn't exactly angry.

User avatar
filmyfan
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 9:50 am

Re: 952 The Magnificent Ambersons

#295 Post by filmyfan » Sat Jan 26, 2019 11:34 am

hearthesilence wrote:
Sun Jan 20, 2019 6:12 pm
Jesus, this is a pretty Herculean effort. Just skimming it now, but it looks like he even fabricated stills from lost shots using existing materials via Photoshop. (Looking at the lost ending - Moorehead's face looks like it was duplicated from the same still for several re-created shots meant to portray different angles.)
Fantastic site..just a glance at it so far...so much to dip into..

Answered a few of my questions re: locations already!

User avatar
FrauBlucher
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:28 pm
Location: Greenwich Village

Re: 952 The Magnificent Ambersons

#296 Post by FrauBlucher » Sat Jun 27, 2020 1:46 pm

I watched this again with the Carringer commentary. He mentioned that Moorhead and Cotten were against re-shooting the end. Did Moorhead and Cotten talk about the ending years down the road that have been documented? Also, was the reason Cortez didn't work on some of the re-shoots was because of scheduling?

User avatar
Roger Ryan
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: A Midland town spread and darkened into a city

Re: 952 The Magnificent Ambersons

#297 Post by Roger Ryan » Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:14 am

FrauBlucher wrote:
Sat Jun 27, 2020 1:46 pm
I watched this again with the Carringer commentary. He mentioned that Moorhead and Cotten were against re-shooting the end. Did Moorhead and Cotten talk about the ending years down the road that have been documented? Also, was the reason Cortez didn't work on some of the re-shoots was because of scheduling?
Although he didn't specifically reference the ending,in a BFI Q & A done for The Third Man circa early 1980s (available on the Studio Canal Blu-ray of that film), Cotten was asked about the initial edit of Ambersons and he stated emphatically that "Orson's version was better". Keep in mind, he had already suffered a debilitating stroke prior to this Q & A, so he was having trouble speaking, but the great effort he exerted to give this response seems to indicate it was important to him to make this preference clear (having remained friends with Welles, it's likely he felt this was the only honorable response to give forty years later). I'm not certain how much he and Moorehead protested shooting the new ending in 1942; there were certainly attempts to shorten the film but retain the original ending through subsequent previews after the initial two "disastrous" previews. I suspect the actors' own sense of loyalty to Welles gave them pause about re-shooting the end, but I don't believe they fought against it in the same way that Charlton Heston did when he initially refused to do re-shoots on Touch of Evil.

As to Cortez, he had already been largely replaced on the film by other cinematographers (primarily Harry Wild and Russell Metty) for the final third of principal photography, so I don't think there was any attempt to bring him back for re-shoots*. All of the re-shoots were directed by the film's assistant director Freddie Fleck, using Nicholas Musuraca as cinematographer, over six days in mid-April 1942, with the exception of the first half of the Fanny/George water heater scene (re-shot May 19th) which credits Welles' production manager Jack Moss as director (I believe Fleck was busy working on his next assistant director assignment by that time).

*Given that he was the chief cinematographer during only the first two-thirds of principal photography, and over forty-five minutes of Welles' footage was ultimately removed, Cortez is actually responsible for a little less than half of the material that remains in the 88 minute release version.

User avatar
TheKieslowskiHaze
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2020 10:37 am

Re: 952 The Magnificent Ambersons

#298 Post by TheKieslowskiHaze » Sun Jun 06, 2021 5:13 pm

Orson Welles' lost cut of 'The Magnificent Ambersons' may still be in Brazil. TCM seems to be betting on it. Or, at the very least, they're betting that the documentary resulting from the search will be profitable.

pistolwink
Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 3:07 am

Re: 952 The Magnificent Ambersons

#299 Post by pistolwink » Thu Jun 10, 2021 1:22 pm

[]
Last edited by pistolwink on Sat Aug 14, 2021 4:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
J Wilson
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 11:26 am
Contact:

Re: 952 The Magnificent Ambersons

#300 Post by J Wilson » Thu Jun 10, 2021 2:10 pm

The documentary will probably consist of the standard history of the film's troubled post-production, intercut with footage of this guy touring whatever film vaults he can get into, and an interview or two with people who heard from a friend of a friend of a friend that they saw the mythic lost print screened at someone's house in 1965 or whatever. It'll end with the failure to find said print of course, but hope lives on...

Post Reply