217 Tokyo Story

Discuss releases by Criterion and the films on them. Threads may contain spoilers!
Post Reply
Message
Author
georgec
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2011 2:28 am

Re: 217 Tokyo Story

#201 Post by georgec » Thu Aug 15, 2013 7:25 pm

During the BN sale I had been hoping for a BD upgrade for this film. Very happy it's coming!

User avatar
jsteffe
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 9:00 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: 217 Tokyo Story

#202 Post by jsteffe » Thu Aug 15, 2013 7:33 pm

andyli wrote:Are the images on the new cover made from framegrabs of the 4k restoration? In that case can we see this as an early clue that Criterion will get rid of the tint from Shochiku's master?
I don't think we can assume very much about how the Criterion version will look until it actually comes out. It's possible they will apply their own tweaks to the 4k restoration, or that the Shochiko Blu-ray had some tweaks of its own compared to the restoration, including the tint.

User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

Re: 217 Tokyo Story

#203 Post by Michael Kerpan » Thu Aug 15, 2013 9:56 pm

Toda Family, which I've seen several times now, has not really improved its standing (with me) over time. Still pretty close to the bottom of my Ozu list.

User avatar
dwk
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 6:10 pm

Re: 217 Tokyo Story

#204 Post by dwk » Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:21 pm

New extra added to the upcoming dual-format release:
Documentary from 1988 about actor Chishu Ryu’s career at Shochiku’s Ofuna studios, featuring a lengthy interview with Ryu

User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

Re: 217 Tokyo Story

#205 Post by Michael Kerpan » Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:23 pm

dwk wrote:New extra added to the upcoming dual-format release:
Documentary from 1988 about actor Chishu Ryu’s career at Shochiku’s Ofuna studios, featuring a lengthy interview with Ryu
Sounds lovely, do they say how long this is?

User avatar
dwk
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 6:10 pm

Re: 217 Tokyo Story

#206 Post by dwk » Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:26 pm

I copied the description directly from Criterion's Tokyo Story page, and it had no indication of the documentary's length.

User avatar
kindaikun
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 3:04 pm

Re: 217 Tokyo Story

#207 Post by kindaikun » Thu Aug 22, 2013 11:05 pm

Presumably the top one listed here, although the year seems to be 1980 rather than 1988.
俳優笠智衆 わたしと松竹大船撮影所 ("Actor Ryu Chishu: Shochiku Ofuna Studio and Me")
The run time is listed variously as 60 minutes or 46 minutes but since this was broadcast on TV, it's presumably 46 mins. sans ads.
It seems it may have been included on Shochiku's first Ozu box set back in 2003 but that has long since gone OOP.
It sounds very interesting though, I'm looking forward to seeing it.

User avatar
FrauBlucher
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:28 pm
Location: Greenwich Village

Re: 217 Tokyo Story

#208 Post by FrauBlucher » Thu Oct 10, 2013 5:38 pm

For the folks in the NY Area: The Film Forum has added the 60th Anniversary Restoration to their calendar. It will be screening Oct 16 thru Oct 24. Perfect timing with the blu ray release coming.

User avatar
HerrSchreck
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 11:46 am

Re: 217 Tokyo Story

#209 Post by HerrSchreck » Fri Oct 11, 2013 11:33 am

Nice! I'll definitely get there.

User avatar
manicsounds
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 10:58 pm
Location: Tokyo, Japan

Re: 217 Tokyo Story

#210 Post by manicsounds » Sat Oct 19, 2013 8:23 am


artfilmfan
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:11 pm

Re: 217 Tokyo Story

#211 Post by artfilmfan » Sat Oct 19, 2013 10:07 am

As some of us have expected, it appears that Criterion has corrected the brownish look of the Japanese release.

User avatar
tenia
Ask Me About My Bassoon
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:13 am

Re: 217 Tokyo Story

#212 Post by tenia » Sat Oct 19, 2013 6:11 pm

artfilmfan wrote:As some of us have expected, it appears that Criterion has corrected the brownish look of the Japanese release.
The question remains : was it to be corrected or should it have this sepia tint ?
FWIW, the French Carlotta release has retained this sepia tint.

User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

Re: 217 Tokyo Story

#213 Post by Michael Kerpan » Sat Oct 19, 2013 9:33 pm

No sign of sepia that I can tell in the shots from The University of Tokyo restoration project: http://www.um.u-tokyo.ac.jp/publish_db/ ... 01-15.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
HerrSchreck
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 11:46 am

Re: 217 Tokyo Story

#214 Post by HerrSchreck » Mon Oct 21, 2013 11:32 am

tenia wrote:
artfilmfan wrote:As some of us have expected, it appears that Criterion has corrected the brownish look of the Japanese release.
The question remains : was it to be corrected or should it have this sepia tint ?
FWIW, the French Carlotta release has retained this sepia tint.
I can't imagine that a black and white film was intended to have anything but black and white tonalities. Emulsions on vintage preservation copies sometimes over time get a greenish look, a bluish look, occasionally a yellowish brown look, but these are to be corrected during the transfer if not during photochem resto to a new low contrast interneg or whatever. This is NOT Wee Willie Winkie, I assure you!

User avatar
tenia
Ask Me About My Bassoon
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:13 am

Re: 217 Tokyo Story

#215 Post by tenia » Mon Oct 21, 2013 2:28 pm

Could it be that a film stock generate warmer tones, with an overall look tending towards "reddish/brownish" color ?

jojo
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 1:47 pm

Re: 217 Tokyo Story

#216 Post by jojo » Thu Oct 24, 2013 12:19 pm

I had seen a few (admittedly battered) film prints of Tokyo Story prior to the restoration and none of them had the sepia tone. Unless wear and tear "bled" the sepia tone out of the prints and made them look "black and white again", which seems highly unlikely and far-fetched. When I saw the Shochiku BD screenshots my first reaction was that someone had definitely messed up.

User avatar
andyli
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 4:46 pm

Re: 217 Tokyo Story

#217 Post by andyli » Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:27 am

tenia wrote:Could it be that a film stock generate warmer tones
Black and White film stock has no color temperature, period. It contains no dye couplers in the emulsion. The black (or the white rather) comes from silver particles.

User avatar
tenia
Ask Me About My Bassoon
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:13 am

Re: 217 Tokyo Story

#218 Post by tenia » Fri Oct 25, 2013 2:04 pm

andyli wrote:
tenia wrote:Could it be that a film stock generate warmer tones
Black and White film stock has no color temperature, period. It contains no dye couplers in the emulsion. The black (or the white rather) comes from silver particles.
Thanks for the precision. :)

User avatar
The Elegant Dandy Fop
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 3:25 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: 217 Tokyo Story

#219 Post by The Elegant Dandy Fop » Tue Oct 29, 2013 11:13 pm


User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

Re: 217 Tokyo Story

#220 Post by Michael Kerpan » Tue Oct 29, 2013 11:26 pm

The Elegant Dandy Fop wrote:DVDBeaver
Judging solely by the dvdbeaver screen captures, I'd say Criterion has thrown in some extra sharpening (in addition to eliminating the warmish tinge of the Shochiku release). I would hope the Criterion subs are better -- but not certain yet that I see a reason to buy a 3rd blu-ray version. ;~}

artfilmfan
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:11 pm

Re: 217 Tokyo Story

#221 Post by artfilmfan » Sat Nov 02, 2013 9:12 pm

Surprisingly, the more frequently I look at the screen capture comparisons between the Shochiku and the Criterion, the more favorable toward the Shochiku I feel. Doesn't the much larger file size of the Shochiku (nearly 45 Gbytes vs. 28 Gbytes) mean that there is more visual information/detail in it? And the larger your TV screen size, the more noticeable the difference is visually?

User avatar
andyli
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 4:46 pm

Re: 217 Tokyo Story

#222 Post by andyli » Sat Nov 02, 2013 10:49 pm

artfilmfan wrote:Doesn't the much larger file size of the Shochiku (nearly 45 Gbytes vs. 28 Gbytes) mean that there is more visual information/detail in it?
This is only true when:
1) Shochiku and Criterion use the same encoding methodology, hence the same efficiency.
2) There is more visual info/detail in the source to call for a data size that is greater than 28GB in the first place.

With TS being a 4:3 B/W picture of normal length, I'd say there is a lot of redundant data in Shochiku's encode. But then again, Criterion is not particularly known for doing sufficient/efficient encodes :-" .

artfilmfan
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:11 pm

Re: 217 Tokyo Story

#223 Post by artfilmfan » Sun Nov 03, 2013 4:17 pm

Thanks for your reply, Andy.

I've just looked at the file size of Charulata at DVDBeaver. It's 35 Gbytes. And Charulata is 17 minutes shorter than Tokyo Story. I think it would be hard to find anyone who does not think that Charulata looks wonderful.

Considering that Criterion needs disc space for the extra materials, I just hope that the Criterion Tokyo Story is a case of "best looking possible" (lossless compression) instead of "looking good enough" (acceptable compression).

User avatar
tenia
Ask Me About My Bassoon
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:13 am

Re: 217 Tokyo Story

#224 Post by tenia » Sun Nov 03, 2013 7:57 pm

In all logic, with the same source, there's probably not a lot of things a higher average bitrate can do, except avoiding compression artefacts and helping for a better resolve of the film grain.
As a base, it's always better to properly max out everything you can, but a high bitrate is not always needed. Moreover, you can still have a high bitrate and get compression artefacts.
However, to give exemples of movies which are quite action-packed (so draining a need for high bitrates) and are not 4:3 (so with more picture not being just black bars) :
Star Trek Into Darkness has a 26 Mbps AVB, Super 8 23 Mbps, The Dark Knight Rises 23 Mbps, The Amazing Spider Man 23 Mbps, Scott Pilgrim 25 Mbps, Brave 24 Mbps, Oz The Great 27 Mbps, Man Of Steel 21 Mbps, etc etc.

artfilmfan
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:11 pm

Re: 217 Tokyo Story

#225 Post by artfilmfan » Sun Nov 03, 2013 9:52 pm

tenia wrote:In all logic, with the same source, there's probably not a lot of things a higher average bitrate can do, except avoiding compression artefacts and helping for a better resolve of the film grain.
I've been trying to come up with a word to describe the Shochiku. I keep thinking of "textured". When I look at the screen capture comparisons at DVDBeaver, what I've kept thinking is that the Shochiku looks more textured. The best example is screen capture #3. Grandma simply looks better (more textured) in the Shochiku capture. I wonder if "a higher average bitrate ... helping for a better resolve of the film grain" has something to do with the more textured look.

This more textured look is what makes me leaning toward the Shochiku. (Oh, about Grandpa's hair looking ... ahem... "orangey", I'll just have to accept that.)


And among other things, the prominent film grain seen on the Charulata caps is what makes the Criterion Blu-ray of Charulata look very appealing and wonderful.

Post Reply